Future societies essay
If we can do it well, we will be better able not only to preserve our moral tradition and to confer to our children an implicit sense of human dignity and human excellence, but also to preserve the preconditions for liberal and libertarian virtues and freedoms.
Meeting that challenge requires individual freedom to innovate, and this must not be constrained for the sake of vague concerns about unpredictable consequences. Diminished concepts of human activity, human relations, and human dignity might affect the present generation only mildly, indeed perhaps only theoretically.
The question is whether these changes will diminish or enhance the lives lived under their influence.
It is a desire to start not from scratch, but from individual, rational, freely choosing adults, and to progress only from there. Some threats to transmission and to childhood are very real — and some biotechnologies, which reach children at a primal biological level, may pose such threats — but we should not go too far in estimating the vulnerability of the next generation.
The child is protected in the arms of a family that is in turn strengthened and reinforced by a culture friendly to its cause.
Essay on imagining the future
Most arguments about technology are therefore really arguments about the future. Catholicism and Ancient Egypt were chosen to be analyzed because they were both based around social hierarchies No one can know exactly what these changes will mean. In purely biological terms, the trait-selected child would still have an unknown potential, because we are not likely to develop anything approaching absolute control of the biology of our descendents. This might occur when certain potential innovations stand to meaningfully undermine our ability to pass along to future generations the ideals, the virtues, the knowledge, the traditions, the living spirit of our society — that is, when innovation stands to alter something so profound about the human experience that the inheritance of the future would be significantly diminished as a result of its loss. For better or worse, the future will be shaped by the innovations and advances of the present: by what we develop, what we build, what we learn, what we discover, what we try and test and deem worthwhile. The work of the culture is the work of cultivating human souls, providing them with nourishment and with protection as they grow. The prospects of genetic selection or manipulation; of mood, memory, or personality control; of radical life-extension, and similar biotechnological possibilities add up to the prospect of taking our own nature in hand and making it an object of manipulation and design. This way of thinking often has a powerfully edifying influence: we feel compelled to live well so that we provide a model of a life well lived for those who follow. Indeed, what stands out about the anthropology of generations is not so much a desire to protect children from the dangers of the world — a desire shared by nearly everyone — but rather the related determination to protect the world from the dangerous consequences of failing to instruct the up-and-coming generation. Zechariah unprecedented picnics, its trichlorethylene bleach phenomenally sung. Most of the time, you will see profanity being used and the people involved trying to degrade one another for not agreeing with them. The lesson of the anthropology of generations is not so much that the past should be preserved, or even that change should somehow be governed in its every detail. Rather, it imagines an open-ended process of progress, by which new ideas and new knowledge are turned into new power and put in the service of the pursuit of happiness.
The particular technology being debated is often secondary to these larger much-disputed themes, and the public debate is shaped by different ways of imagining the future at least as much as by the specific technical potential of a new device or technique.
But how, then, can we discern the difference? To examine a particular society in depth, it is imperative to appreciate their understanding of justice. The necessary tools for this critical ongoing mission — families, communities, institutions, and cultures that encourage transmission and initiation — are therefore permanently necessary, and are generally more important than almost anything else we might imagine when we think about the future.
Whether people are from Europe or the Middle East everyone has an opinion on the subject.
based on 19 review